The user also uploaded a stress test of the CPU to demonstrate its power consumption, which hit 257W, which was within the margin of error of the processor's 250W PL2 power rating. The contrast between it and its predecessor, the i9-11900K, is much greater, as it achieves 640 points in the single-core test and around 6400 points in the multi-core test, demonstrating the tremendous leap in performance from one generation to the next. In comparison, the Ryzen 9 5950X achieves approximately 650 and 10,500 points in these tests, indicating that the Core i9-12900K exceeds it in single-core and equals it in multi-core, despite having less threads than the latter. The snapshot taken after completing both Cinebench R20 tests reveals that the Core i9-12900K achieved 768cb in the single-core test and 10545cb in the multi-core test, both of which are excellent results for a mid-range processor.
I9 9900k cinebench r20 windows#
The operating system in use was Microsoft Windows 11. In addition, because the motherboard had very early bios, the Thermal Velocity Boost function did not work properly, resulting in the CPU reaching 5.1GHz rather than 5.3GHz in the single-core testing, which was disappointing. Versus the similarly priced Ryzen 9 3900X, however, the 9900KS is beaten by a sizeable 49 seconds or 24%.A new Core i9-12900K test in Cinebench R20 was discovered, exposing the findings of its performance in both the single core test and the multi-core test, as well as disclosing what to expect in both areas.Īccording to the person who tested the CPU, it was tested on a B660 motherboard with DDR4-3600 RAM rather than DDR5, which means that it is not getting the most out of this CPU's capabilities. Overclocked is where the 9900KS flexes its might, with the 5.2GHz clock speed opening up a 2.5% lead over the 3900X.Ī 13 second time reduction versus the 9900K gives Intel’s 5GHz special edition part a 6% lead in Blender. Hitting 4.6GHz properly, the Ryzen 9 3900X actually beats Intel’s 9900KS by the slightest of margins at stock.
I9 9900k cinebench r20 update#
Interestingly, the AGESA ABBA update for AMD’s Ryzen 3000 parts puts heavy pressure on the 5GHz Coffee Lake Refresh chip. Yet again, we see impressive single-threaded performance from the high-frequency 9900KS. Versus the Ryzen 9 3900X price competitor, Intel’s 5GHz chip is handed a crushing performance defeat. AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700X is also beaten by 7%, though it is a cheaper product. The 5GHz 9900KS is 5% faster than the stock 9900K in Cinebench R20 multi-threaded performance. The 9900KS scores in this benchmark typify that point.
It really is impressive to see how far Intel has pushed the 14nm node for high-frequency performance. Hovering around the top of our chart, even the efficient Zen 2 architecture cannot claw back enough performance to offset the sheer frequency advantage for Intel’s Coffee Lake Refresh chip. Single-threaded performance gives the 9900KS a strong victory in Cinebench R15. The similarly priced Ryzen 9 3900X and its dozen Zen 2 cores comprehensively outperform Intel’s 5GHz octa-core by 46% stock versus stock. Overclocking to 5.2GHz adds another 84 points or 4% to the 9900KS’s score.Ĭompared to AMD, the 9900KS beats the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X narrowly both at stock and overclocked speeds. Starting with Cinebench R15, we see Intel’s Core i9-9900KS deliver multi-core performance that is 7% faster than the stock 9900K.
0 kommentar(er)
